This question was recently asked, and despite it's opinion-based nature I tried to answer it with the most factual answer I could. However, it got
closed as primarily opinion-based.
I can understand why, but in the small description below is says:
answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.
I feel that my answer was sufficiently based on
facts and references, and that the question is now valid. My answer provides enough good information to help someone make a decision, and has little/no opinion in it.
Basically I want to know if having a good answer to a closed question can merit it a reopen. I think it should, as the answer could be helpful to others, assuming it is well written and not opinion-based.